Follow us on:
- Key Facts at a Glance
- Why Does the RBI Give This Money to the Government?Section 47, Section 48, ownership since 1949, and the legal mandate
- How Does the RBI Earn Its Income?Four sources: forex reserves, revaluation gains, G-Secs, and banking operations
- The Committee History: How the Policy EvolvedSubrahmanyam (1997), Thorat (2004), Malegam (2013-14), Jalan (2018-19)
- The Economic Capital Framework: The Rule That Governs the Amount
- Why Was FY 2025-26 a Record Year?
- What Does This Mean for the Government?
- The Complete Historical Timeline: FY 2012-13 to FY 2025-26
- Reading the Trend: Three Phases
- A Word of Caution: What Critics Say
- Frequently Asked Questions
Key Facts at a Glance
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Exact Amount Transferred | Rs 2,86,588.46 crore (approx. Rs 2.87 lakh crore) |
| For Financial Year | 2025-26 (April 2025 to March 2026) |
| Decision Taken At | 623rd meeting of the Central Board of Directors of the RBI, Mumbai |
| Date of Decision | 22 May 2026 |
| Chaired By | Governor Sanjay Malhotra |
| Previous Record (FY 2024-25) | Rs 2,68,591 crore (approx. Rs 2.69 lakh crore), announced May 2025 under Governor Sanjay Malhotra |
| Increase Over Previous Year | Approx. Rs 17,997 crore more; approximately 6.7 per cent higher |
| RBI Net Income (FY 2025-26) | Rs 3,95,972.10 crore (before risk provisions and statutory fund transfers) |
| RBI Net Income (FY 2024-25) | Rs 3,13,455.77 crore |
| Gross Income Growth (FY 2025-26) | 26.42 per cent over previous year |
| Expenditure Growth (before provisions) | 27.60 per cent over previous year |
| CRB Maintained For FY 2025-26 | 6.5 per cent of balance sheet; Rs 1,09,379.64 crore transferred to CRB |
| CRB in FY 2024-25 | 7.5 per cent (maximum of revised ECF range); Rs 44,861.70 crore transferred to CRB |
| RBI Balance Sheet (31 March 2026) | Rs 91,97,121.08 crore (expanded 20.61 per cent over previous year) |
| Legal Basis for Transfer | Section 47 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 |
| Tax Exemption | Section 48 of the RBI Act: RBI is exempt from income tax and super tax on all its income |
| Framework Governing Amount | Revised Economic Capital Framework (ECF), based on Bimal Jalan Committee report (August 2019) |
Why Does the RBI Give This Money to the Government?
The Legal Mandate: Section 47 of the RBI Act, 1934
The Reserve Bank of India transfers its surplus to the central government every year because the law requires it to. Section 47 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, titled “Allocation of Surplus Profits,” states:
The word “shall” makes this a legal obligation, not a discretionary act. The RBI must first make all required provisions for reserves, risk buffers, and staff obligations. Whatever remains after that must go to the central government. The RBI has no power to retain the surplus for itself beyond what the ECF framework permits.
The Tax Exemption: Section 48 of the RBI Act, 1934
Section 48 of the RBI Act provides that the Reserve Bank is not liable to pay income tax or super tax on any of its income or profits. This means the RBI’s entire gross income, after internal provisioning, is available for transfer to the government without any reduction for tax. No corporate entity enjoys this advantage. The full surplus, net of required provisions, flows to the government. This is why the transferable surplus is so large relative to gross income.
The Ownership Angle: Government as Sole Owner Since 1949
The Reserve Bank of India was established in 1935 as a private shareholders’ bank under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. The Government of India nationalised the RBI in January 1949 under the Reserve Bank of India (Transfer to Public Ownership) Act, 1948. Since then, the Government of India has been the RBI’s sole owner and holds the entirety of its paid-up capital of Rs 5 crore. As the sole owner, the government receives all profits after provisioning, exactly as a sole shareholder receives all dividends from a wholly-owned enterprise.
The Functional Logic
Beyond law and ownership, there is a functional rationale. The RBI acts as banker to the government, manages India’s public debt, and conducts monetary policy. The income it earns in the course of these functions is, in effect, generated on behalf of the state. Retaining more than is needed for financial stability would mean the government’s own agent accumulating capital at the government’s expense.
The genuine challenge is not whether to transfer, but how much to transfer. Too little and the government loses a legitimate non-tax revenue source. Too much and the RBI is left under-capitalised for crisis management. This is precisely what the committees and the ECF framework are designed to resolve.
How Does the RBI Earn Its Income?
The RBI is a central bank, not a commercial institution. Profit generation is not its mandate. But in the course of managing monetary policy, the exchange rate, liquidity, and the government’s accounts, it inevitably earns income from four main sources.
1. Interest on Foreign Currency Assets
The RBI holds India’s foreign exchange reserves, which stood at approximately USD 688 billion as of March 2026. These are invested primarily in high-rated foreign sovereign securities, US treasury bills, and other safe international instruments. The interest earned on these investments is a large and recurring income stream. The RBI also earns trading gains when it buys or sells foreign currency in the market to manage the rupee exchange rate.
2. Revaluation Gains on Foreign Exchange Reserves (Largest Driver in FY 2025-26)
The RBI holds most of its foreign currency reserves in US dollar-denominated assets. When the rupee weakens against the dollar, the rupee-equivalent value of these dollar holdings rises automatically. Under the ECF framework, a portion of these revaluation gains can be recognised as income and transferred to the government after allocating the required amount to the Revaluation Reserve. In FY 2025-26, the dollar strengthened considerably, the rupee weakened to approximately Rs 87.95 per dollar in February 2026. Since the RBI had accumulated large dollar reserves over many years at much lower exchange rates (estimated average cost approximately Rs 68–69 per dollar), the mark-to-market gain was substantial. Revaluation gains on forex reserves were confirmed by Bank of Baroda economist Dipanwita Mazumdar as the primary driver of the FY 2025-26 record.
3. Interest on Domestic Government Securities and OMO Purchases
The RBI holds a large portfolio of Indian Government Securities (G-Secs) and earns interest on them. In FY 2025-26, the RBI conducted record Open Market Operation (OMO) purchases, buying government bonds from the market to inject liquidity into the banking system. This expanded the domestic G-Sec portfolio significantly. With benchmark yields elevated, the interest income on this larger portfolio was substantially higher than in previous years. This was confirmed as the second major driver of the FY 2025-26 record.
4. Liquidity Operations and Banking Services
The RBI earns interest on funds it lends to banks through the Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF) and other lending windows. It also earns fees from currency management, and from providing banking, settlement, and government account management services. These are smaller but consistent contributors.
The Committee History: How the Policy Evolved
The framework governing how much of the RBI’s surplus is transferred to the government did not arrive in its current form overnight. It was shaped over decades by four major committees, each responding to a different fiscal or institutional challenge.
| Committee | Year | Key Recommendations | Immediate Impact on Transfers |
|---|---|---|---|
| V. Subrahmanyam Committee | 1997 | Reviewed RBI’s capital adequacy and reserve framework. Recommended maintaining a Contingency Fund (CF) and an Asset Development Reserve (ADR) at levels sufficient to absorb financial shocks. Introduced structured thinking about what reserves the RBI must hold before any surplus is distributed. | Established the principle that specific, identifiable reserves must be maintained before surplus distribution. Transfers remained moderate and governed by informal norms. No dramatic shift in amounts. |
| Usha Thorat Committee | 2004 | Reviewed the ECF again. Recommended maintaining the CF and ADR at levels sufficient to cover monetary and financial stability risks. Emphasised transparency in the framework. Recommended that provisioning to the CF should be linked to the balance sheet size. | Reinforced the reserves-first principle. Modestly formalised the framework. Transfer amounts remained moderate through the 2000s. |
| Y.H. Malegam Committee | 2013–14 | Concluded that the CF and ADR were at adequate levels. Recommended that for the next three fiscal years, the RBI should transfer 99.99 per cent (effectively all) of its annual surplus to the government, rather than diverting any portion to the CF or ADR. Reasoned that the government needed funds to reduce its high fiscal deficit and that reserves were already sufficient. | Immediate and dramatic impact. In FY 2013-14, the RBI transferred 99.99% of its surplus — up from 53.4% the previous year. Transfer jumped from Rs 33,010 crore (FY 2012-13) to Rs 52,679 crore (FY 2013-14), and then to Rs 65,896 crore (FY 2014-15) — historically high at the time. |
| Bimal Jalan Committee | 2018–19 | Constituted in December 2018 amid public tension between the government and RBI over the size of RBI’s reserves. Recommended the formal Economic Capital Framework (ECF) with the Contingent Risk Buffer (CRB) range of 5.5%–6.5% of balance sheet. Recommended a one-time transfer of Rs 52,637 crore of excess provisions identified above the ECF’s requirements. Chaired by former RBI Governor Bimal Jalan; vice-chaired by former Deputy Governor Rakesh Mohan. | Resolved the government-RBI dispute. Led to the record transfer at the time: Rs 1,76,051 crore for FY 2018-19 (comprising Rs 1,23,414 crore regular surplus and Rs 52,637 crore one-time excess provisions). Gave the framework a formal, rule-based, publicly documented foundation that has governed every transfer since August 2019. |
The Economic Capital Framework: The Rule That Governs the Amount
The ECF, introduced following the Bimal Jalan Committee’s report (August 2019), provides an objective and transparent rule-based methodology for determining how much of the RBI’s surplus can be transferred to the government. It rests on two key parameters.
The Contingent Risk Buffer (CRB)
The CRB is a capital reserve maintained by the RBI to absorb unexpected financial shocks: currency crises, systemic banking failures, and large-scale monetary or exchange rate emergencies. Before any surplus is transferred to the government, the RBI must allocate enough income to keep the CRB within its prescribed range as a percentage of the balance sheet. The original ECF (2019) set the CRB range at 5.5 per cent to 6.5 per cent. The revised ECF, approved on 15 May 2025 for use from FY 2024-25, widened this range to 4.5 per cent to 7.5 per cent. Any net income remaining after maintaining the CRB within this range, and after all other provisions, is available for transfer.
| Year | CRB Level | Amount to CRB | Surplus to Govt. |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2018-19 to FY 2021-22 | 5.5% (minimum of original range) | As needed to maintain 5.5% | Varied: Rs 1,76,051 Cr (FY19) to Rs 30,307 Cr (FY22) |
| FY 2022-23 | 6.0% | Higher than minimum | Rs 87,416 crore |
| FY 2023-24 | 6.5% | Higher allocation | Rs 2,10,874 crore |
| FY 2024-25 | 7.5% (maximum of revised range) | Rs 44,861.70 crore | Rs 2,68,591 crore |
| FY 2025-26 | 6.5% (mid-range) | Rs 1,09,379.64 crore | Rs 2,86,588.46 crore |
In FY 2025-26, the CRB was brought from 7.5 per cent back to 6.5 per cent. Despite the absolute rupee amount transferred to the CRB being far larger (Rs 1.09 lakh crore vs Rs 44,862 crore in FY25), total income grew so strongly that the transferable surplus still exceeded the previous year’s record.
Why Was FY 2025-26 a Record Year?
Three factors converged to produce a surplus that surpassed the previous record set just a year earlier.
Factor 1: Revaluation Gains on Forex Reserves (Primary Driver)
The US dollar strengthened considerably against major currencies including the rupee during FY 2025-26. The rupee weakened to approximately Rs 87.95 per dollar in February 2026 before recovering somewhat. Since the RBI had accumulated large dollar reserves over many years at average acquisition costs estimated around Rs 68–69 per dollar, the rupee-equivalent mark-to-market gain on these holdings was enormous. The RBI’s balance sheet expanded by 20.61 per cent to Rs 91.97 lakh crore by 31 March 2026, with a large part of this expansion reflecting rupee-value appreciation of its dollar assets. Bank of Baroda’s research note of 22 May 2026 confirmed revaluation gains on forex reserves as the primary driver.
Factor 2: Record OMO Purchases and Higher Bond Income (Second Driver)
In FY 2025-26, the RBI undertook record Open Market Operation (OMO) purchases of government securities to manage banking system liquidity. This expanded its domestic G-Sec portfolio significantly. With benchmark bond yields elevated, interest income on the larger portfolio was substantially higher than in previous years. The Bank of Baroda note confirmed this as the second major driver.
Factor 3: Strong Overall Income Growth Despite Higher CRB Provisioning
RBI gross income grew 26.42 per cent in FY 2025-26. Net income before risk provisions rose from Rs 3,13,455.77 crore to Rs 3,95,972.10 crore. Despite allocating Rs 1,09,379.64 crore to the CRB (more than double the previous year’s Rs 44,861.70 crore), the total income growth was strong enough to leave a larger surplus for transfer to the government.
Factor 4: Geopolitical and Fiscal Context
Rising geopolitical tensions in West Asia, volatile crude oil prices, and pressure on the rupee created a challenging fiscal environment. Governor Sanjay Malhotra noted at the 623rd Board meeting that the surplus transfer provides financial leeway amid geopolitical challenges. The government’s need for non-tax revenue was particularly acute, making the record transfer fiscally significant.
What Does This Mean for the Government?
Non-Tax Revenue Windfall
The RBI surplus transfer is classified as non-tax revenue in the Union Budget. For FY 2025-26, the government had budgeted approximately Rs 2.56 lakh crore from dividends and profits from the RBI, public sector banks, and other financial institutions combined. The RBI surplus alone of Rs 2.87 lakh crore exceeds the entire budgeted amount for this combined category. This is a significant windfall for the government’s revenue position.
Fiscal Deficit Relief and Reduced Market Borrowing
Every rupee that flows from the RBI to the government is one less rupee the government needs to borrow from the market. A higher-than-budgeted RBI surplus directly reduces the gross market borrowing requirement. This eases pressure on government bond yields and reduces crowding out of private investment.
Liquidity Injection into the Banking System
When the RBI transfers the surplus to the government and the government subsequently spends it, this money flows back into the banking system as government expenditure. After the FY 2024-25 transfer announcement, India’s banking system surplus liquidity was expected to rise to Rs 5.5–6 lakh crore in the weeks following the transfer. A similar dynamic follows the FY 2025-26 record transfer. This liquidity injection exerts downward pressure on short-term interest rates.
Bond Market Note
Despite the fiscal relief, the Bank of Baroda research note flagged that the 10-year government bond yield is expected to remain above 7 per cent due to ongoing geopolitical uncertainties. The dividend provides fiscal space but does not eliminate underlying rate pressures.
The Complete Historical Timeline: FY 2012-13 to FY 2025-26
The RBI followed a July–June accounting year until FY 2019-20. It transitioned to an April–March year from FY 2021-22 onwards. The transition created a nine-month period (July 2020 to March 2021) for which the surplus was declared separately. This nine-month figure is not directly comparable to full-year figures.
| Year | Period | Surplus Transferred | Key Context and Verified Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Jul 2012 – Jun 2013 | Rs 33,010 crore | Only 53.4% of total surplus transferred. Pre-Malegam Committee era. RBI retained a large portion in CF and ADR. |
| 2013-14 | Jul 2013 – Jun 2014 | Rs 52,679 crore | Approximately 60% jump over FY 2012-13. First year of near-full surplus transfer following Malegam Committee recommendation. RBI transferred 99.99% of surplus. |
| 2014-15 | Jul 2014 – Jun 2015 | Rs 65,896 crore | About 25% higher than FY 2013-14. Previous record before FY 2018-19. Board meeting chaired by Governor Raghuram Rajan. |
| 2015-16 | Jul 2015 – Jun 2016 | Rs 65,876 crore | Marginally lower than FY 2014-15. RBI statement confirmed: “The amount was Rs 65,896 crore for the previous year.” |
| 2016-17 | Jul 2016 – Jun 2017 | Rs 30,659 crore | Sharp fall. Demonetisation (November 2016) led to massive expenditure on designing and printing new currency notes. Directly reduced RBI net income. Lowest since FY 2012-13. |
| 2017-18 | Jul 2017 – Jun 2018 | Rs 50,000 crore | Recovery from the demonetisation year. Total surplus for the full year was Rs 50,000 crore, of which Rs 10,000 crore was paid as an interim dividend in March 2018 and the remaining Rs 40,000 crore was paid after the August 2018 board meeting. |
| 2018-19 | Jul 2018 – Jun 2019 | Rs 1,76,051 crore total (Rs 1,23,414 crore regular surplus + Rs 52,637 crore one-time excess provisions) | Landmark transfer. Record at the time. The Bimal Jalan Committee ECF was adopted. In addition to the operating surplus, Rs 52,637 crore of excess provisions identified under the new ECF were transferred as a one-time measure. Rs 28,000 crore had already been paid as interim dividend. CRB maintained at 5.5%. |
| 2019-20 | Jul 2019 – Jun 2020 (Last full July–June year) | Rs 57,128 crore | Lower year. The RBI was a net buyer of foreign currency (not a seller), so forex trading gains were minimal. Government had budgeted Rs 60,000 crore. CRB maintained at 5.5%. Board meeting chaired by Governor Shaktikanta Das. |
| Transition Period: Jul 2020–Mar 2021 | Jul 2020 – Mar 2021 (9 months only — NOT a full year) | Rs 99,122 crore | Nine-month transition period only. RBI aligned its accounting year from July–June to April–March. Despite only nine months of income, transfer exceeded the previous full year (Rs 57,128 crore), driven by forex transaction gains (up 69% to Rs 50,629 crore) and a sharp 63% fall in expenditure. A change in accounting allowed the RBI to book gains on forex sales against historical weighted-average cost. CRB maintained at 5.5%. |
| 2021-22 | Apr 2021 – Mar 2022 (First full April–March year) | Rs 30,307.45 crore | Lowest in 8 years. The RBI had pumped massive COVID-19 liquidity. Banks parked excess liquidity with the RBI at the reverse repo rate. The interest outgo on this surplus liquidity (excess liquidity of Rs 7 lakh crore in the banking system) significantly dented RBI profitability. While income rose 20%, expenditure jumped 280% due to provisions of Rs 1.15 lakh crore for the Contingency Fund. CRB maintained at 5.5%. |
| 2022-23 | Apr 2022 – Mar 2023 | Rs 87,416 crore | Sharp recovery. COVID liquidity wound back. Interest rates rose globally, boosting forex and domestic income. CRB set at 6 per cent (50 bps higher than minimum). |
| 2023-24 | Apr 2023 – Mar 2024 | Rs 2,10,874 crore | First time exceeding Rs 2 lakh crore. A 141 per cent jump over FY 2022-23. Record at the time. Driven by higher forex income, higher domestic interest income, and rising gold prices. CRB set at 6.5 per cent. Decided at 608th Central Board meeting chaired by Governor Shaktikanta Das. |
| 2024-25 | Apr 2024 – Mar 2025 | Rs 2,68,591 crore | Record at time of announcement (May 2025). 27.4 per cent higher than FY 2023-24. CRB set at 7.5 per cent (maximum of revised ECF range). RBI sold USD 371.6 billion in FY25, more than double USD 153 billion in FY24, generating large forex realised gains. Decided under Governor Sanjay Malhotra. |
| 2025-26 | Apr 2025 – Mar 2026 | Rs 2,86,588.46 crore (All-time record) | Current all-time record as of June 2026. Approximately 6.7 per cent higher than FY 2024-25. Primary drivers: revaluation gains on forex reserves (rupee weakened to ~Rs 87.95/USD) and record OMO purchases expanding G-Sec portfolio. CRB maintained at 6.5 per cent (Rs 1,09,379.64 crore allocated). Net income Rs 3,95,972.10 crore. Balance sheet expanded 20.61% to Rs 91.97 lakh crore. Decided at 623rd Central Board meeting, 22 May 2026, chaired by Governor Sanjay Malhotra. |
(1) The FY 2018-19 total of Rs 1,76,051 crore includes Rs 52,637 crore of one-time excess capital provisions from the Jalan Committee recommendation. The regular operating surplus was Rs 1,23,414 crore. These two components are not comparable to regular annual transfers.
(2) The transition period figure of Rs 99,122 crore covers only nine months (July 2020 to March 2021), not a full financial year. Comparing it to full-year figures overstates it on an annualised basis.
Reading the Trend: Three Distinct Phases
Phase 1: The Malegam Era (FY 2013-14 to FY 2015-16)
Following the Malegam Committee’s recommendation to transfer virtually all of the surplus, transfers jumped from Rs 33,010 crore in FY 2012-13 to Rs 52,679 crore in FY 2013-14, then to Rs 65,896 crore and Rs 65,876 crore in the following two years. These were historically high at the time but appear modest by today’s standards.
Phase 2: Demonetisation and COVID Disruptions (FY 2016-17 to FY 2021-22)
Two distinct shocks disrupted transfers. Demonetisation (November 2016) caused a sharp drop to Rs 30,659 crore in FY 2016-17. Then the COVID-19 liquidity surge caused the lowest transfer in eight years in FY 2021-22 (Rs 30,307 crore). FY 2018-19 produced a one-off spike (Rs 1,76,051 crore) due to the Jalan Committee’s excess provisions transfer, but this was a one-time event, not a new baseline.
Phase 3: Post-COVID Surge (FY 2022-23 to FY 2025-26)
From FY 2022-23 onwards, the surplus has risen every single year and entered a completely different order of magnitude: Rs 87,416 crore, Rs 2.11 lakh crore, Rs 2.69 lakh crore, and Rs 2.87 lakh crore. The drivers are structural: unwinding of COVID liquidity, rising global interest rates boosting returns on foreign currency assets, a stronger dollar boosting revaluation gains, and higher domestic yields boosting G-Sec income. As The Wire’s analysis noted, economists polled by Reuters observed that government reliance on RBI transfers has surged 55-fold over two decades, with the dividend now constituting approximately 7.6 per cent of the government’s estimated total revenue for FY 2025-26.
A Word of Caution: What Critics Say
Growing Fiscal Dependence on RBI Transfers
Economist Ajit Ranade, writing in Mint ahead of the FY 2025-26 announcement, cautioned that once governments start depending on central bank transfers, subtle pressures arise to maintain lower risk contingency buffers, maximise profits via forex gains, support government borrowing, and optimise central bank profitability. He argued these pressures could, over time, undermine the RBI’s monetary credibility. The Wire’s analysis noted that between FY13 and FY19, as the fiscal deficit declined, RBI dividends largely remained below Rs 70,000 crore. Post-pandemic, this relationship has become disconnected, with dividends surging even as fiscal pressures remained elevated.
Revaluation Gains Are Accounting Profits, Not Realised Cash
A significant portion of the FY 2025-26 surplus derives from revaluation gains on foreign exchange reserves. These are mark-to-market accounting gains, not cash actually received. The dollar-denominated assets have risen in rupee value because the rupee weakened, but the RBI has not sold those assets. If the rupee appreciates significantly in a future year, these gains will reverse. Transferring revaluation gains to the government today could, in a stress scenario, require the RBI to rebuild its reserve base from future income.
CRB Reduction in a Period of Global Uncertainty
The CRB was at 7.5 per cent in FY 2024-25 (the maximum of the revised ECF range) and was brought down to 6.5 per cent in FY 2025-26. Critics note that in a period of geopolitical stress, global uncertainty, and currency volatility, the RBI should ideally be building, not reducing, its crisis buffer. The ECF does permit the CRB to fall as low as 4.5 per cent. If the CRB is progressively reduced in challenging macro conditions, it may compromise the RBI’s capacity as lender of last resort.
Closing Thoughts
The RBI’s record Rs 2.87 lakh crore surplus transfer for FY 2025-26 is the product of three convergent factors: a weaker rupee generating large revaluation gains on dollar-denominated reserves, record OMO purchases expanding the domestic bond portfolio, and elevated global interest rates boosting returns on foreign currency assets. All three came together in the same year.
The legal and institutional picture is equally clear. The government receives this transfer because Section 47 of the RBI Act mandates it, because the government is the RBI’s sole owner since 1949, and because the RBI pays no tax on its earnings under Section 48. The amount is governed by the ECF, which evolved through four decades of committee recommendations and now provides a transparent, rule-based methodology for determining the transferable surplus.
For the government, this is fiscal relief at a moment of genuine need. For economists and analysts, the sustainability of a model that increasingly relies on central bank revaluation gains warrants careful scrutiny. For businesses and investors, the liquidity that flows into the banking system after each large surplus transfer has real consequences for short-term interest rates and money market conditions.
At FiscalZenith, we will track how the government deploys this windfall and whether developments at the RBI, including any revision to the ECF or CRB range, change the transfer dynamics in the years ahead.
It is legally mandatory. Section 47 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 uses the word “shall”: after making all required provisions, the balance of profits “shall be paid to the Central Government.” The RBI has no discretion to withhold the surplus. What the ECF and the Bimal Jalan Committee provide is a methodology for determining how large the required provisions (CRB, realised equity) are before arriving at the transferable surplus. The transfer itself is not optional.
No. Section 48 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 provides a complete exemption. The RBI is not liable to pay income tax or super tax on any of its income or profits. This means the entire surplus, after internal provisioning for reserves and risk buffers, flows to the government without any tax deduction. This is why the amounts transferred are so large relative to gross income.
The transferable surplus is determined by the RBI’s income in a given year, not by its accumulated reserves. In FY 2021-22, the RBI had pumped enormous COVID-19 liquidity into the banking system. Banks parked excess liquidity (approximately Rs 7 lakh crore) with the RBI at the reverse repo rate. The RBI paid interest on this parked liquidity. This interest outgo was so large that even though income rose 20 per cent, expenditure jumped 280 per cent due to provisions of Rs 1.15 lakh crore for the Contingency Fund. Holding large reserves on the balance sheet does not by itself generate current-year income; only what those reserves actually earn determines the annual surplus.
FY 2018-19 was exceptional for two distinct reasons. First, the regular operating surplus was Rs 1,23,414 crore, driven by higher forex income. Second, an additional Rs 52,637 crore was transferred as a one-time measure: these were excess capital provisions that the RBI had accumulated above and beyond what the newly created ECF (recommended by the Bimal Jalan Committee) determined was necessary. The Committee concluded that Rs 52,637 crore of capital was in excess of the ECF’s requirements and could be transferred to the government. This one-time component is not comparable to regular annual operating surplus transfers.
The CRB is a capital reserve that the RBI maintains to absorb unexpected financial shocks, such as a currency crisis, a systemic banking failure, or a sudden need for large-scale liquidity support. Before any surplus is transferred to the government, the RBI must first allocate enough income to keep the CRB within its prescribed range (currently 4.5 per cent to 7.5 per cent of the balance sheet under the revised ECF). The income remaining after this allocation, and after all other statutory provisions, is what gets transferred. In FY 2025-26, the RBI allocated Rs 1.09 lakh crore to the CRB alone before arriving at the transferable surplus of Rs 2.87 lakh crore.
The impact is indirect but real. A larger surplus transfer means the government needs to borrow less from the market. Lower government borrowing can keep interest rates lower, which benefits home loan, auto loan, and business loan borrowers. The transfer is also a non-tax revenue receipt, meaning the government does not need to raise taxes to fund spending when it receives a large RBI surplus. Additionally, the liquidity that flows into the banking system when the government spends the transferred funds can lower short-term interest rates, affecting savings account returns and fixed deposit rates across the banking system.
This article is for informational and educational purposes only. All figures are based on official RBI press releases and verified from primary news sources. This article does not constitute financial or investment advice. Updated as of June 2026.








