Follow us on:
- Part I: Why This Took 19 Years to Conclude 2007 launch, 2013 suspension, 2022 relaunch, and the geopolitical pressures that finally closed the deal
- Part II: The Deal’s Structure in Numbers EU and India tariff concessions side by side, from PIB and European Commission primary sources
- Part III: Sector-by-Sector Impact for Indian Exporters Interactive guide: Textiles, Apparel, Leather, Chemicals, Pharma, Gems, Marine Products, IT Services
- Part IV: What India Has Conceded Cars from 110% to 10%, wines reduced, machinery, chemicals. What stays protected.
- Part V: CBAM: The Carbon Tax That the FTA Did Not Solve What CBAM is, which Indian sectors it hits, the 20-35% levy, and what the FTA does and does not say about it
- Part VI: The Services Deal — IT, Professional Mobility, and Financial Services
- Part VII: Ratification, Timeline, and Entry Into Force EU legal review, Parliament consent, India Cabinet approval. Why early 2027 is the realistic target.
- Part VIII: What the FTA Means for the Rupee, Trade Balance, and Indian Industry
- Frequently Asked Questions
Part IWhy This Took 19 Years to Conclude
The Long Road from 2007 to 2026
India and the European Union launched FTA negotiations in June 2007 under the Broad-Based Trade and Investment Agreement (BTIA) framework. The talks proceeded through 15 formal rounds over six years before being suspended in 2013. The breakdown was driven by four irreconcilable disagreements: India’s refusal to lower automobile tariffs to levels acceptable to European car manufacturers; EU demands for access to India’s wine and spirits market that India’s domestic producers resisted; EU concerns about data protection for its companies operating in India; and disagreements over intellectual property protections, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector where India’s generic drug industry had substantial interests.
Between 2013 and 2022, multiple attempts to revive the talks produced limited progress. The strategic environment shifted materially after 2022. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine demonstrated to both India and the EU the risks of excessive dependence on any single supply chain partner. The US-China trade war and the imposition of American tariffs on a wide range of goods underlined the value of diversifying trade relationships. India’s rapid economic growth, making it the world’s fifth-largest economy, elevated the commercial significance of FTA access to its market. Negotiations were formally relaunched on June 17, 2022, covering the FTA, an Investment Protection Agreement (IPA), and a Geographical Indications (GI) Agreement.
From 2022 to 2025, negotiations intensified through multiple rounds. The 14th and last formal negotiating round took place in October 2025. By January 2026, agreement had been reached on approximately 20 of the 24 negotiating chapters. The remaining chapters were resolved through intersessional discussions at technical and political level. Negotiations concluded on January 27, 2026, at the 16th India-EU Summit. Commerce Secretary Rajesh Agrawal described the deal as “balanced and forward-looking” from India’s perspective. The EU’s Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic stated it showed that “win-win trade is real.” Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal confirmed India’s tariff position at the post-deal press conference.
Part IIThe Deal’s Structure in Numbers
The tariff concession structure of the FTA is asymmetric, reflecting the starting position of both sides. The EU enters the agreement with relatively low average tariffs on Indian goods. India enters with high average industrial tariffs of over 16%. The concessions, therefore, look larger on India’s side in absolute terms, but both sides are offering substantial liberalisation relative to their baseline.
| Indian Export Sector | EU Tariff Range (Pre-FTA) | FTA Treatment | India’s Export Value to EU (2024) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Textiles | Up to 12.0% | 100% zero duty at entry into force | USD 1.636 billion |
| Apparel and Clothing | Up to 12.0% | 100% zero duty at entry into force | USD 5.706 billion |
| Leather and Footwear | Up to 17.0% | 100% zero duty at entry into force | USD 2.511 billion |
| Chemicals | Up to 12.8% | 59.3% at entry into force; 39.1% phased | USD 13.684 billion |
| Gems and Jewellery | Up to 4.0% | 96.6% at entry into force | USD 2.661 billion |
| Plastic and Rubber | Up to 6.5% | 62.7% at entry into force; 37.3% phased | USD 2.556 billion |
| Base Metals | Up to 10.0% | 79.1% at entry into force; subject to CBAM | USD 3.351 billion |
| Marine Products | Up to 26.0% | 94.4% at entry into force; 1.9% phased | USD 0.239 billion immediate |
| Toys and Sports Goods | Up to 4.7% | 100% zero duty at entry into force | USD 102 million combined |
| Furniture and Consumer Goods | Up to 10.5% | 94.2% at entry into force | USD 0.818 billion |
Part IIISector-by-Sector Impact for Indian Exporters
Part IVWhat India Has Conceded
Cars: The Most Politically Significant Concession
India’s automobile tariff concession is the most commercially significant and politically visible concession in the entire agreement. India currently imposes tariffs of up to 110% on imported passenger cars. Under the FTA, India will gradually reduce car tariffs to as low as 10% over the transition period. Car parts tariffs will be fully eliminated after 5 to 10 years. This is a fundamental shift in India’s automobile market protection policy. European luxury and premium car manufacturers, including BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Volkswagen, and Stellantis brands, currently face tariffs that make their vehicles prohibitively expensive for all but the wealthiest Indian buyers. The phased reduction to 10% will make European vehicles significantly more accessible over time.
The concession was structured with a long phase-in period precisely because of its sensitivity to India’s domestic automobile industry. The Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) had long resisted any automobile tariff concession in trade negotiations. The final concession is phased, and the timeline of 5 to 10 years gives Indian manufacturers time to develop competitive responses. The rules of origin for automobiles are stringent, requiring a high value addition criteria to prevent non-Indian or non-EU assembled vehicles from taking advantage of the preferential tariff.
Wines and Spirits: Reduction but Not Zero
Indian tariffs on wines and spirits currently reach up to 150%. Under the FTA, EU wine exports to India will see duties reduced over time to 30% for most wines, 40% for all spirits, and 50% for beer. Non-alcoholic beer and several fruit juices (currently facing up to 55% tariff) will be eliminated after 5 years. Importantly, the FTA does not eliminate these duties entirely. India declined to grant zero tariffs on alcoholic beverages, reflecting the sensitivities of state excise revenues (which are administered by state governments and not directly negotiated in the FTA) and domestic spirits producers. The reductions are nonetheless commercially significant for EU exporters, as current tariffs are so high that they effectively prohibit European wine at price points accessible to most Indian consumers.
Machinery, Chemicals, and Pharmaceuticals: The EU’s Industrial Gains
For EU industrial exporters, the FTA offers access to a market that currently imposes average tariffs of over 16% on industrial goods. India agreed to immediate liberalisation on 49.6% of tariff lines at entry into force, covering 30.6% of EU export value. The remaining 39.5% of tariff lines, covering 63.1% of EU export value, will see phased elimination over 5, 7, or 10 years. This means that most of the high-value EU exports to India (machinery, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, aircraft components) are in the phased category, not the immediate one. The European Commission estimates its exporters will save approximately 4 billion euros annually in customs duties once the FTA is fully implemented, reducing the cost disadvantage relative to competitors already benefiting from other India FTAs.
Part VCBAM: The Carbon Tax That the FTA Did Not Solve
What CBAM Is
The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is a carbon levy designed to prevent “carbon leakage,” the phenomenon where EU companies might relocate manufacturing to countries with less stringent carbon regulations to avoid the costs of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS). Under CBAM, importers of specific carbon-intensive goods must purchase CBAM certificates reflecting the carbon price that would have been paid under the EU ETS if the goods had been produced in the EU.
CBAM entered its transitional phase on October 1, 2023, during which importers had to report emissions but did not yet pay the financial adjustment. The mechanism came into full force on January 1, 2026, with actual financial obligations now applying. CBAM currently targets six sectors: iron and steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, electricity, and hydrogen. The EU has proposed expanding CBAM to approximately 180 downstream manufactured goods from 2028.
What the FTA Does and Does Not Say About CBAM
The India-EU FTA provides no exemption for Indian steel and aluminium exporters from CBAM. This is confirmed by the European Commission’s chapter-by-chapter summary and by multiple analyses of the FTA text. Indian negotiators explicitly sought CBAM concessions or a phase-in arrangement for India as a developing country. These requests were not accommodated in the final text. What the FTA does include is an Annex on Carbon Border Measures, which establishes a platform for technical dialogue and policy coordination between India and the EU on CBAM implementation. The FTA also includes a Most Favoured Nation clause that ensures India benefits from any CBAM flexibility the EU grants to other countries in future agreements.
The CBAM Expansion Risk
A draft report published by the European Parliament’s Environment Committee in April 2026 proposed expanding CBAM to approximately 180 downstream manufactured goods from 2028. If implemented, this would extend carbon costs to Indian exports of engineering goods, automobile components, and machinery parts, significantly widening the set of Indian exports affected. The FTA’s MFN clause and the technical dialogue Annex give India limited procedural tools to challenge or participate in this expansion, but no veto over it. The CBAM expansion risk represents the single largest medium-term challenge to the commercial benefits of the FTA for Indian industrial exporters.
For Indian exporters to mitigate CBAM costs, the monitoring, reporting, and verification of actual emissions from their production processes is critical. CBAM charges are calculated on actual embedded emissions, not default values. Using actual emissions data rather than default values can significantly reduce the CBAM obligation for cleaner producers. However, default values carry a penalty markup (10% in 2026, rising to 30% in 2028), making compliance especially onerous for smaller exporters who lack the capacity to track and verify their production emissions accurately.
Part VIThe Services Deal: IT, Professional Mobility, and Financial Services
Services trade between India and the EU stood at EUR 59.8 billion in 2024 (approximately USD 65 billion), with EU services exports to India at EUR 26 billion and Indian services exports to the EU at EUR 33.8 billion. India’s services surplus with the EU in 2024 reflects the dominance of IT and IT-enabled services, professional services, and business process management in India’s export profile.
The mobility provisions are commercially critical for India’s IT services sector. Intra-Corporate Transferees, which includes managers and specialists moving within a company from India to its EU subsidiary or client site, get guaranteed entry for three years extendable to five, with explicit rights for dependent family members. Contractual Service Suppliers get a cumulative 12-month stay across 37 sub-sectors including IT, professional services, R&D, and education. Independent Professionals get similar 12-month access across 17 sub-sectors. These provisions address a structural barrier India’s IT exporters have faced: the inconsistency and unpredictability of EU member state visa regimes for Indian IT professionals.
For UPI and digital payments, the financial services chapter includes provisions that create market access opportunities for Indian payment service providers in the EU. These could facilitate expansion of UPI-based payment systems into the European market, leveraging India’s demonstrated capability in real-time payment infrastructure.
Part VIIRatification, Timeline, and Entry Into Force
The conclusion of negotiations on January 27, 2026 was not the end of the process. It was the beginning of the legal and political ratification process that must be completed before the FTA’s benefits can flow to exporters and importers.
The full FTA text must undergo legal scrubbing or textual review, during which both sides’ legal teams review the agreed text for internal consistency, alignment with existing laws, and technical accuracy. The text must then be translated into all 24 official EU languages. This process typically takes four to six months for a comprehensive FTA. Both sides stated immediately after the January 27 conclusion that they were aiming to complete the legal review and sign the agreement within five to six months, suggesting a formal signing around June to July 2026.
After the legal review, the European Commission submits a proposal to the Council of the European Union, which must approve the agreement by a qualified majority. The European Parliament must then give its consent by a simple majority. The European Parliament’s consent is not automatic: MEPs have rejected FTAs before when they had concerns about labour rights, environmental standards, or the adequacy of protections for European industry. The India-EU FTA’s Trade and Sustainable Development chapter, which includes labour and environmental provisions, is likely to face scrutiny in the Parliament. This process is expected to take several months.
India does not require parliamentary ratification for a trade agreement. The FTA requires only Cabinet, which is the Union Council of Ministers, approval. This is a significantly simpler process than the EU’s multi-stage institutional process and is expected to be completed once the EU has concluded its own ratification. Commerce Secretary Rajesh Agrawal confirmed this at the January 27 post-deal press conference.
Part VIIIWhat the FTA Means for the Rupee, Trade Balance, and Indian Industry
The Trade Balance Impact
India currently runs a goods trade surplus with the EU. In FY 2024-25, India exported USD 75.85 billion and imported USD 60.68 billion from the EU, a surplus of approximately USD 15.17 billion. The FTA is likely to narrow this surplus over time, as EU exports to India benefit from reduced tariffs, particularly in cars, machinery, and chemicals. However, the narrowing will be gradual because the EU’s largest export categories to India (cars and machinery) are in the phased tariff reduction schedule, not the immediate zero-duty category.
On the services side, India runs a surplus, exporting EUR 33.8 billion and importing EUR 26 billion in services from the EU. The services chapter’s mobility provisions and sub-sector commitments are designed to expand India’s services surplus further, particularly in IT and professional services, which are already India’s dominant competitive advantage in the bilateral relationship.
What It Means for the Rupee
The FTA’s medium-term impact on the rupee operates through two channels. First, if Indian goods exports to the EU grow significantly following the tariff elimination, foreign currency inflows increase, which supports the rupee by reducing the current account deficit. Given the 70.4% immediate tariff elimination covering 90.7% of India’s export value, the export growth potential is substantial, particularly for textiles, apparel, and leather, which are both export-ready and employment-intensive. Second, as EU goods exports to India increase following India’s tariff reductions, import payments in euros increase, which puts modest downward pressure on the rupee. The net impact on the rupee depends on which channel is larger. Given India’s goods surplus with the EU and the immediate nature of India’s export gains versus the phased nature of EU goods gaining full market access, the short-term rupee impact is modestly positive.
The Bottom Line on the Mother of All Trade Deals
The India-EU FTA is genuinely historic in scope. No trade agreement India has ever signed comes close to the scale of market access it provides or the scale of concessions it involves on both sides. The combination of 70.4% immediate EU tariff elimination, services mobility for India’s IT professionals, and zero-duty access for all of India’s textiles, apparel, and leather exports represents the most favourable trading arrangement India has ever secured with a developed market.
But three things constrain the short-term commercial benefit. First, the deal is not yet in force. Until early 2027, nothing changes for exporters. Tariffs remain at current MFN rates. Second, CBAM is already in force and already imposing costs on Indian steel and aluminium exporters that the FTA’s tariff reductions cannot fully offset. For these sectors, the FTA is a partial win at best. Third, India’s automobile industry concession of reducing car tariffs from 110% to 10% over time, while necessary to conclude the deal, represents a fundamental policy shift whose impact on domestic producers will depend heavily on how quickly and deeply European cars penetrate India’s passenger vehicle market.
For Indian textile exporters who have spent years losing EU market share to Bangladesh and Vietnam, January 27, 2026 was the day the structural disadvantage ended. For Indian IT companies, it was the day EU professional mobility became a treaty right rather than a visa lottery. For Indian steel producers trying to read their future export economics, it was the day they confirmed the EU will not give them any relief from CBAM, regardless of how many tariff concessions they received on everything else. All three readings are correct. That is what a 19-year negotiation produces: a deal large enough to contain all of these realities simultaneously.
Negotiations were formally concluded on January 27, 2026, at the 16th India-EU Summit at Hyderabad House in New Delhi. The conclusion was announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and European Council President Antonio Costa. However, conclusion of negotiations is not the same as entry into force. After January 27, the agreement undergoes a legal review and translation into all 24 official EU languages, which is expected to take four to six months. After that, the European Commission submits a proposal to the Council of the EU for a qualified majority vote, and the European Parliament must give its consent. India requires only Cabinet approval, which is simpler. Both parties aim to sign the agreement formally within five to six months of the January 27 conclusion. Entry into force is expected in early 2027, meaning tariff reductions will not apply to actual trade until then. All figures cited in the FTA relate to the agreement’s terms upon entry into force, not from January 27, 2026.
The 70.4% figure refers to the percentage of EU tariff lines on which the EU will eliminate duties immediately upon entry into force of the FTA. These 70.4% of tariff lines cover 90.7% of India’s export value to the EU, as confirmed in the Government of India PIB FAQ published January 29, 2026. The sectors covered by this immediate elimination include textiles (100% of lines), apparel and clothing (100%), leather and footwear (100%), gems and jewellery (96.6%), toys and sports goods (100%), marine products (94.4%), furniture and consumer goods (94.2%), and portions of chemicals and base metals. A further 20.3% of EU tariff lines will see zero duties over 3 to 5 years, covering 2.9% of India’s export value. The remaining 6.1% of tariff lines covering 6% of India’s export value will have preferential access through tariff reductions or Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs), applicable to cars, certain steel products, and certain shrimp products. The EU has excluded certain categories entirely from concessions: meat and meat offal, dairy products, honey, rice, sugar, and tobacco.
CBAM, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, is an EU policy that took full effect on January 1, 2026. It requires importers of certain carbon-intensive goods to purchase CBAM certificates reflecting the carbon price that would have been paid under the EU’s Emissions Trading System if those goods had been produced in the EU. CBAM currently applies to six sectors: iron and steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, electricity, and hydrogen. The India-EU FTA provides no exemption from CBAM for Indian exporters. This means that while Indian steel and aluminium exporters gain from tariff reductions on base metals (79.1% of lines reduced immediately under the FTA), they simultaneously face CBAM levies estimated at 20% to 35% of the value of those exports. The CBAM cost applies because India’s steel production is predominantly coal-based blast furnace, with a significantly higher carbon intensity than EU benchmark production. India’s steel and aluminium exports to the EU fell 24.4% in FY25, to USD 5.8 billion, before CBAM financial payments even started, reflecting anticipatory compliance costs. The FTA includes an Annex on Carbon Border Measures establishing a technical dialogue, and an MFN clause ensuring India gets any CBAM flexibility extended to other countries, but neither provides relief from the levy itself.
India’s most significant concession is the reduction of car tariffs from up to 110% currently to as low as 10% over the transition period, with car parts tariffs fully eliminated after 5 to 10 years. India also offered 49.6% of tariff lines at zero duty immediately (covering 30.6% of EU export value) and 39.5% of tariff lines in phased elimination over 5, 7, or 10 years (covering 63.1% of EU export value). India’s total offer covers 92.1% of EU tariff lines and 97.5% of EU export value. On wines and spirits, India reduced but did not eliminate duties: most wine duties reduce to 30%, all spirits to 40%, and beer to 50%. On agricultural products, India offered improved but limited market access, excluding beef and poultry, dairy products, certain cereals, edible oils, and tobacco from meaningful liberalisation. The auto and machinery sectors in India face the most competitive pressure from EU imports as Indian tariffs on these categories are reduced over time. India did not agree to data exclusivity provisions for pharmaceutical IP, protecting its generic drugs industry’s ability to produce generic versions of EU-originated medicines.
The FTA’s services chapter includes significant mobility provisions for Indian IT professionals. Intra-Corporate Transferees, comprising managers and specialists moving from Indian companies to their EU subsidiaries or client sites, receive guaranteed entry for 3 years extendable by 2 years subject to domestic law, with rights for dependent family members. Contractual Service Suppliers can stay for a cumulative 12 months across 37 EU sub-sectors, including IT and professional services. Independent Professionals get similar 12-month access across 17 sub-sectors. India’s IT sector gains commercially meaningful commitments from the EU in 144 services sub-sectors including IT/ITeS, computer-related services, professional services, other business services, and education services, per the Government of India PIB FAQ. These mobility provisions address a long-standing barrier for Indian IT companies: the inconsistency and unpredictability of EU member state visa regimes. The FTA establishes a treaty right rather than leaving mobility to each member state’s discretion. Trade in services between India and the EU stood at approximately EUR 59.8 billion in 2024, with Indian services exports exceeding EU services exports to India. The mobility and services chapter is expected to significantly expand India’s services trade surplus with the EU.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and is current as of June 2026. All tariff figures and sector-specific concession details are sourced from the Government of India Press Information Bureau FAQ on the India-EU FTA (PRID 2220413, January 29, 2026) and the European Commission’s official Chapter-by-Chapter Summary of the EU-India Free Trade Agreement (policy.trade.ec.europa.eu, January 2026). Bilateral trade values are from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, and the European Commission’s official trade page on India. CBAM details are sourced from the European Commission CBAM regulation and from ECIPE and Carboncopy.info analyses citing the FTA Annex on Carbon Border Measures. The ratification timeline is based on Amundi Research Center analysis (January 30, 2026) citing official post-deal statements from both parties. Nothing in this article constitutes investment or trade advisory. fiscalzenith.com accepts no liability for business decisions made in reliance on this article.








